April 2006 - Boost-announce - lists.stage.boost.cppalliance.org

[Boost Review] Property Tree Library
by Thorsten Ottosen 19 Apr '06

19 Apr '06

Dear All, I have the great pleasure to announce that the formal boost-review of Marcin Kalicinski Property Tree Library begins now (the 18th of April) and runs through the 27th of April. Introduction ------------ This fairly high-level library consists of the following facilities: 1. a generic recursive property-tree data-structure 2. generic conversions to/from this data-structure from/to a. xml-files b. ini-flies c. json-files d. windows registry files As an example of how powerful the library is, consider this tutorial: - http://kaalus.atspace.com/ptree/doc/index.html#five_minute_tutorial The library may be downloaded from - the boost file vault http://boost-consulting.com/vault/ (property_tree_rev5.zip) - tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/fkt7r - boost sandbox: http://www.boost.org/more/mailing_lists.htm#sandbox (look in boost/property_tree and libs/property_tree) The documentation may be viewed online at - http://kaalus.atspace.com/ptree/doc/index.html If your find the above interesting, please consider submitting a review to the boost developer mailing list: - http://www.boost.org/more/mailing_lists.htm#main You might end up using several hours on a review, but the end result could be a superb library that will save you weeks of work. Notes for reviewers ------------------- When writing your review, you may wish to consider the following questions: * What is your evaluation of the design? * What is your evaluation of the implementation? * What is your evaluation of the documentation? * What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? * Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? * How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? * Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? And finally, every review should answer this question: * Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library? Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments don't obscure your overall opinion. In particular, consider if you can answer the following questions: - was the library suitable for your daily xml-tasks? If not, what was missing? - was the library's performance good enough? If not, can you suggest improvements? - was the library's design flexible enough? If not, how would you suggest it should be redesigned to broaden its scope of use? best regards Thorsten Ottosen, Review Manager

1 0

[review] promotion traits - result
by Tobias Schwinger 12 Apr '06

12 Apr '06

Dear Boost community, Alexander Nasonov's Promotion Traits have been accepted conditionally into Boost with 4/4 positive votes. The conditions are - an example must be added to the documentation (plus accompanying source code for the example folder), - the reference should be clarified (cv-qualification, bit fields) - further conditions might arise from the merger with the extended library (TypeTraits) and are subject to synchronization with the library maintainer (John Maddock). Thanks to Alexander for the submission and to our reviewers for their work! Regards, Tobias (Review Manager)

1 0

[review] promotion traits - review period extended until April 9.
by Tobias Schwinger 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Dear users & members of Boost, I decided to extend the review period of the fast-track review for Promotion Traits until April 9 because there were only three reviews until now. That is, you have another three days to submit your evaluation of the proposed Boost software. Cheer up, it's a small & fast-to-track submission! We're very much looking forward to your reviews. Download URL ============ http://cpp-experiment.sourceforge.net/promote-20050917.tar.gz About the submission ==================== The Promotion Traits extend Boost.TypeTraits with templates that compute the type after promotion has been applied. Example: // given template<typename T> struct some_algorithm; template<> struct some_algorithm<int> { [...] }; // [...] more specializations // , [...] some_algorithm< typename integral_promotion<T>::type > [...] // makes some_algorithm work for any type T that promotes to an integer // (that is enums and smaller integral types) without the need for // additional specialization Review questions ================ Please always explicitly state in your review, whether you think the library should be accepted into Boost. You might want to comment on the following questions: - What is your evaluation of the design? - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? Regards, Tobias (Review Manager)

1 0

[review] promotion traits
by Tobias Schwinger 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

The review of Alexander Nasonov's Promotion Traits start today. Since it's a small contribution it will be fast-track reviewed and the end of the review period is scheduled for April 6. Download URL ============ http://cpp-experiment.sourceforge.net/promote-20050917.tar.gz About the submission ==================== The Promotion Traits extend Boost.TypeTraits with templates that compute the type after promotion has been applied. Example: // given template<typename T> struct some_algorithm; template<> struct some_algorithm<int> { [...] }; // [...] more specializations // , [...] some_algorithm< typename integral_promotion<T>::type > [...] // makes some_algorithm work for any type T that promotes to an integer // (that is enums and smaller integral types) without the need for // additional specialization Review questions ================ Please always explicitly state in your review, whether you think the library should be accepted into Boost. You might want to comment on the following questions: - What is your evaluation of the design? - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? Regards, Tobias (Review Manager)

1 0