January 2002 - Boost-users - lists.stage.boost.cppalliance.org

Poll results for Boost-Users
by Boost-Users＠yahoogroups.com 12 Feb '02

12 Feb '02

The following Boost-Users poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Yahoo! groups can be configured so that only the moderators can view membership list, or so that membership lists can be viewed by anyone (email addresses are always munged for non-moderators; my email address would appear as something like jim.hyslop@.le...) Do you want the membership list to be freely available to be viewed by anyone, or do you want the membership list kept private so only the moderators can view the list? CHOICES AND RESULTS - I want only the moderators to be able to view the membership list, 0 votes, 0.00% - I want anyone to be able to view the membership list, 0 votes, 0.00% For more information about this group, please visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Boost-Users For help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/

2 2

RE: [Boost-Users] Suggestion -- Boost Building
by Wismar, John 01 Feb '02

01 Feb '02

In my case (the most recent how-can-I-build-this question) I'm trying (unsuccessfully) to use the regex library, which requires compiling.... I used to be able to build this, but since the boost.build stuff came along, I've been completely unable to build anything at all. The documentation is worse than useless because it's so self-contradictory.... -------------------------- John Wismar mailto:jwismar@alldata.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Duane Murphy [mailto:duanemurphy@mac.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 12:15 AM > To: Boost Users > Subject: [Boost-Users] Suggestion -- Boost Building > > > It seems a lot of questions come up on the list about > "building" the boost libraries. > > I wonder how many of these people realize that most of the > functionality of the Boost "libraries" is completely > encapsulated in the header files? There are significant > portions like regex and the graph library (?) that do require > compiling, but much of it does not. > > Is there anything that can be done to make it more clear that > compiling is often not necessary? > > I'm just trying to relieve some stress from people who may > very well not require compiling. And I have compassion for > those that do and are having trouble. > > I'm not sure exactly what can be done, but it might be worth > some thought. > > ...Duane > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ---------------------~--> Sponsored by VeriSign - The Value > of Trust Pinpoint the right security solution for your > company - FREE Guide from industry leader VeriSign gives you > all the facts. > http://us.click.yahoo.com/lWSNbC/WdiDAA/yigFAA> /EbFolB/TM > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------~-> > > Info: <http://www.boost.org> > Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> > Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >

2 1

Cannot find regular expression symbols in Solaris debug
by phlasnicek 31 Jan '02

31 Jan '02

Hi, I am using Solaris Workshop 5.0 and I am using boost libraries for regular expressions. Everything builds fine and runs ok except when I try to attach to the process and run the debugger. I get the following error: warning: cannot demangle '__1c9uX__unnamed_6ofsRKVdR8zYNQre_get_error_str6FI_pkc_' Anyone have any suggestions, I would appreciate it very much. Thanks Paul

1 0

RE: [Boost-Users] Digest Number 81
by Anthony Kolarik 31 Jan '02

31 Jan '02

> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:22:32 -0500 (EST) > From: Jeremy Siek <jsiek(a)cs.indiana.edu> > Subject: RE: RE: Dependencies for tokenizer? > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Jeff Garland wrote: > jeff> > jeff> I'm sure there is. It is a matter of getting the "25 lines of > jeff> actual code" (my guess) in those 47 headers that tokenizer > jeff> really needs into a small header. I'm sure with a small > jeff> effort you could do it. Perhaps you could even find a way to > jeff> improve the overall design in the process. > > Well, it could get a little messy. The iterator adaptors use > some stuff > from the type_traits headers, which have lots of workarounds > for different > compilers, etc., etc. > > For a super simple C++ stringtok see the header > > boost/pending/stringtok.hpp > > It's not an official boost library, but you might find it fits > your needs. > > Cheers, > Jeremy Thank you for pointing out the pitfalls of reworking tokenizer and for pointing out boost/pending/stringtok.hpp, it serves fine for my purposes. -- Tony K.

1 0

1_26_0: regex/thread on W32 build via jam?
by John Maddock 31 Jan '02

31 Jan '02

>that's what I'm doing now. >I just want to fully understand the new jam way of building/using boost, >and eg to see what is neccessary to use the 'new way'. >Will the 'old way' be deprecated someday? Probably not any time soon. >Does/will the new way support static libs? It does for regex, can't comment on anything else though. - John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/

1 0

RE: [Boost-Users] Re: boost::pool + shared memory
by Tom Matelich 30 Jan '02

30 Jan '02

I've been using the ACE_Malloc framework from ACE (http://cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html) to solve a similar problem (sharing statics between DLL's). It takes a little while to figure out because the documentation is a little slim, but once you do it pays off pretty quickly. Doxygen documentation for ACE_Malloc is at: http://doc.ece.uci.edu/Doxygen/Current/html/ace/classACE__Malloc__T.html and the shared_mem memory pool is at: http://doc.ece.uci.edu/Doxygen/Current/html/ace/classACE__Shared__Memory__Po ol.html I ended up not having to write an STL allocator using ACE_Malloc, but I don't think it would be too difficult. If you get it right, a lot of ACE users would be your friend :) Tom Matelich > -----Original Message----- > From: xpav_2000 [mailto:alex@pavloff.net] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:01 PM > To: Boost-Users(a)yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Boost-Users] Re: boost::pool + shared memory > > > --- In Boost-Users@y..., Tom Matelich <tmatelich@z...> wrote: > > Looks like pool may not be what I need, darn. I like > > to weasel as many boost classes into my project as possible. > > I've got a similar question -- I've got a whole pile of strings that > I want to share between processes, and I was thinking a reference- > counted string implementation with the actual data in shared memory > would be a good way to do that. > > Do you think a memory pool placed in shared memory, with the string > class modified to allocate/deallocate there would work? > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ---------------------~--> > Tiny Wireless Camera under $80! > Order Now! FREE VCR Commander! > Click Here - Only 1 Day Left! > http://us.click.yahoo.com/nuyOHD/7.PDAA/yigFAA/EbFolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------~-> > > Info: <http://www.boost.org> > Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> > Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

1 0

1_26_0: regex/thread on W32 build via jam?
by Bruno.Voigt＠ic3s.de 30 Jan '02

30 Jan '02

> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 07:55:46 -0500 > From: John Maddock <john_maddock(a)compuserve.com> > Subject: 1_26_0: regex/thread on W32 build via jam? > > >But how do I have to change my project settings for a static executable? > >I just changed the the lib search path to this new monster path and it > >does not work > >The linker is missing the vc7-re300dm.lib then. > > why not carry on using the libs you built from the makefiles? Hi John, that's what I'm doing now. I just want to fully understand the new jam way of building/using boost, and eg to see what is neccessary to use the 'new way'. Will the 'old way' be deprecated someday? Does/will the new way support static libs? > >And how to link the boost thread stuff? > >Is it supported for statically linked apps at all? > Build threadmon.cpp into a dll, and the rest of the source into a static > lib with the options you want. Okay, thanks, I will try this combination. bye, Bruno

1 0

RE: [Boost-Users] boost::pool + shared memory
by Tom Matelich 30 Jan '02

30 Jan '02

Looks like pool may not be what I need, darn. I like to weasel as many boost classes into my project as possible. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Matelich [mailto:tmatelich@zetec.com] > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:49 PM > To: 'boost-users(a)yahoogroups.com' > Cc: 'shammah(a)voyager.net' > Subject: [Boost-Users] boost::pool + shared memory > > > I need to build a system for having miscellaneous objects in > a shared memory > segment. Essentially, we need a few inter-process singletons. These > classes have STL containers, so I was looking at using > pool_allocator and > writing a UserAllocator to use ACE_Mem_Map ( > http://doc.ece.uci.edu/Doxygen/Current/html/ace/classACE__Mem_ > _Map.html#_det > ails ) or something. I just wanted to see if anyone had done anything > resembling this and could give me any pointers or tips. > > Thanks, > > Tom Matelich > > PS Why can't I see who is a member of this group? I wanted > to check to see > if Steve Cleary was a member. Sorry if you are Steve. > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ---------------------~--> > Tiny Wireless Camera under $80! > Order Now! FREE VCR Commander! > Click Here - Only 1 Day Left! > http://us.click.yahoo.com/WoOlbB/7.PDAA/ySSFAA/EbFolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------~-> > > Info: <http://www.boost.org> > Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> > Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >

2 1

RE: Dependencies for tokenizer?
by Anthony Kolarik 30 Jan '02

30 Jan '02

> > > Any ideas about how to get this functionality w/o all the headers? Thanks, > > > -- Tony K. > > > In order to use the tokenizer classes I end up requiring 47 files, which > > What's wrong with 47 files? How much longer does it take to compile? It actually does slow things down noticeably, since it's a small project. > He might be sub setting boost and only wants to include the needed files. Exactly. I have 47 more files checked into source control that everybody else has to download (and have the tool check every time they refresh) so that I can parse a command line. I suppose I could check in the whole boost library, (~2000 files in the download I got,) but I'd rather just take what I need for now. > Anyway, this was brought up during the review, but at the time only 20 files > were needed (the very first tokenizer only need 2 boost headers). It was the > switch to iterator_adaptors that caused the include explosion at the time... Evidently reviewers thought 20 was reasonable, and I assume that some major problems are solved by the 47 headers that weren't by 20. I just wondered if there was a lighter weight way in boost to do my little tokenizing task. Is there? -- Tony K.

4 3

1_26_0: regex/thread on W32 build via jam?
by John Maddock 29 Jan '02

29 Jan '02

>But how do I have to change my project settings for a static executable? >I just changed the the lib search path to this new monster path and it >does not work >The linker is missing the vc7-re300dm.lib then. why not carry on using the libs you built from the makefiles? >And how to link the boost thread stuff? >Is it supported for statically linked apps at all? Build threadmon.cpp into a dll, and the rest of the source into a static lib with the options you want. - John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/

1 0