bad designed api. close() does not need to be public -- it belongs into the destructor.
"?æ½?é£??û"
wrote in message news:AANLkTin6DuWYwIWpf6GAK4TL98drUZ3Q0zsNoomOtfum@mail.gmail.com... Hi, If I call socket.close() but I still have some data in my buffer, can I call async_write() later? When I call socket.close(), maybe an async_write operation is running, when it's complete I want to send data in another buffer(data written while previous async_write() is running, before socket.close() was called), but the socket is closed.Does it work in this situation?If not, what's the alternative way? The code looks like this: char front_buffer[kBufferSize]; char back_buffer[kBufferSize];
void HandleWrite(...) { //socket is closed. Does this work? socket.async_write(back_buffer, ...); }
socket.async_write(front_buffer, HandleWrite); // write data to back_buffer socket.close();
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users