30 Jul
2009
30 Jul
'09
7:05 a.m.
Hi, On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:16:19PM -0600, OvermindDL1 wrote:
I like that syntax, and I can see how it could be better in that it would have better caching (does not need to recreate the object, which is very slow), and it is a more simple syntax then the normal way you can cache it. Looks nice to me.
Well, thanks. Apparently, removing the extra copy of the boost::format object does not change the functionality, so it is removed. Take care, emre