What advantage, if any, do you see over Spirit? At Tuesday 2004-03-09 04:59, you wrote:
In fact, there is an open source C++ parser. It is OpenC++. It has a project on sourceforge and a mail list. It is quite cool, and have a LOT of additional features. One of its uses can however be a parser of C++ code. It works on Unix, Windows + cygwin.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencxx/
Nick
P.S. It would be nice if it was part of boost. It could get a little help from the community, since it is a great project and could lead to many tool build on top of it, like code scanners and checkers, debugging aids and so on. The similar closed source product cost a LOT and not many programmers can afford them.
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Gregor Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 2:37 PM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Compiler Generator Tools
On Monday 08 March 2004 08:56 am, Roel.Sergeant@pandora.be wrote:
If you need a C/C++ parser, you might consider Wave, which uses Spirit, and is highly standard compliant.
Wave's a preprocessor, not a parser. I expect it will be quite a while before we get a C++ parser ("Tsunami?").
Doug _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"