Re: [Boost-users] Re: date-time

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:20:45 -0400, David Abrahams wrote:

"Jeff Garland" writes:

...

I've given in to user demand -- the default constructor to not_a_date_time will be in the 1.32 -- gregorian::date same story.

Why was that the right choice? It seems like an opportunity for bugs.

What would you propose as an alternative? I hope not the current system time, the acquisition of which can be a relatively expensive operation. I for one prefer the not_a_date_time option. -- Caleb Epstein caleb.epstein@gmail.com