Am 22.08.2012 17:47, schrieb Lemay.Steve:
/do you use the bjam version provided by boost-1.51?///
Yes, bjam is created on the first build. I'm using QNX SDK 6.5 SP1 on a Windows hosted development environment. VS2012 also installed. Contents of batch file provide below. (gcc 4.4.2 support, and gcc 4.7.1 prototype)
/on which architecture you have QNX running (i386/x8664,arm, mips, ...), which binary format and which ABI is used?/
Although the SDK support several target processors, this builds target for x86 (AMD K8 architecture -- 32-bit addressing). I believe ELF and SYSV (still need to verify) and the boost toolset configuration is set to qcc (not gcc). Is there a good/simple way to verify the ABI?
As I am not very familiar with bjam syntax - could the boost_1_51_0\libs\context\build\jamfile.v2 just be confused because of the toolset definition? Considering qcc wraps gcc...? I'm looking specifically at:
rule configure ( properties * )
{
local result ;
if ( ! ( <toolset>gcc in $(properties)
|| <toolset>intel in $(properties)
|| <toolset>msvc in $(properties) ) )
{
result = <build>no ;
ECHO "toolset not supported" ;
}
return $(result) ;
}
I don't know qcc, but if I look inside tools/build/v2/tools/qcc.jam it is derived from gcc. The question is if you could use gcc as toolset value on QNX too (bjam toolset=gcc)? Is GNU as available and installed on QNX (required to compile the assembler)? Maybe you could try to add <toolset>qcc in $(properties) in rule configure. Is a free version of QNX available? AFAIK some years ago it was but the new owner of QNX has revoked the free license. Oliver