On 06 September 2012 18:54 Robert Ramey [mailto:ramey@rrsd.com] wrote :-
Hmm - worthy of investigation. Any such Navigator is goint to require Javascript. I don't see this is a downside.
a) Javascript is pretty ubiquitous b) The usage of the "navigator" is optional c) It doesn't take away anything we already have.
According to http://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html#Documentation " The format for documentation should be HTML, and should not require an advanced browser or server-side extensions. Style sheets are acceptable. ECMAScript/JavaScript is not acceptable." Not sure quite why such a explicit refusal of javascript but I imagine there were (at least) good reasons for this so may be worth some discussion to see if the reasons are still extant before doing any work. Alex