Re: [Boost-users] [TR1 Review] TR1 Formal Review Beginning

Hmm, I think a lot of distributions of TR1 will, at first, be edited, copied, trimmed, out-of-date, versions of boost's implementations anyway, so is there a way to say "I want to use the Boost version by default"? (#define?)

No for the following reason: If your vendor supplied version of <utility> already declares the TR1 components inside namespace std::tr1, the there is no way that Boost can do the same thing. If you really want the Boost versions then *use the Boost versions directly*. I guess we could get into namespace renaming: #define tr1 boost_tr1 something like STLport does, but lets see if there's a real demand first. John.