[Boost-users] BOOST_STRONG_TYPEDEF 2

I think its utility and purpose are under appreciated. But it really needs to be worked on some more to make a case for promoting it into more boost usage. Not by us! I really promote this strong typedef in our team. I even think this should be in the c++ standard. Something like the normal typedef, but also something like the strong_typedef.

But perhaps you can have a look at the article: 'True typedefs' from Matthew Wilson (C++ Users Journal march 2003). Wkr, me