"Peter Dimov" wrote in message
news:019001c5242b$3e480c70$6501a8c0@pdimov2...
| Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
| > "David Abrahams" wrote in message
| > news:usm35lvo0.fsf@boost-consulting.com...
| >> I guess the ugly adl_ prefix
| >
| > do you now anything less ugly? It clearly states the purpose of the
| > function.
|
| Both begin() and range_begin() are much less ugly.
well, the first is a no-no due to recursion. the second still don't suggest
its a customization
point.
| adl_ as a prefix doesn't
| save you from colliding with another ADL customization point, if your
| convention catches on.
no, but is that relevant?
-Thorsten
