Re: [Boost-users] boost variant is not a literal type

Robert wrote:

c) Is there any reason that you haven't submitted this to the Boost Library Incubator?

Agustin's reasons in this thread: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2015/06/223920.php Glen -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-variant-is-not-a-literal-type-tp468... Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.