Re: [Boost-users] PropertyTree's XML parsers survey

Nat Goodspeed wrote:

Instead of incrementally enhancing a minimal XML parser, wouldn't it make more sense to jump right to an existing full-blown parser implementation?

In the case of Serialization, that adds a Boost-external dependency. In the case of PropertyTree, this adds a compile-time dependency to a header-only library. Unless that parser is pugxml, but I don't really trust it. Sebastian