Hi Boris, Boris Schaeling wrote:
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:26:05 +0200, Gevorg Voskanyan wrote:
I could not find a response to the following message: http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2008/09/40618.php , which proposes to modify ignore_sigchild() implementation to account for a
proposed BOOST_TEST_IGNORE_SIGCHLD preprocessor switch.
I am seconding this request. Has it ever been considered? Or was it the message simply went unnoticed?
Gevorg,
I didn't test Boost.Process yet with Boost 1.38.0. As Boost.Test is not mentioned on http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1_38_0 I guess there hasn't been any change though.
Yes, the proposed change did not make it into trunk either.
But I also still think Boost.Test should be adapted here (as I didn't have time lately to continue developing Boost.Process it wasn't an urgent issue for me though).
I need this change in order to progress with upgrading boost for a project I'm working on at my company. So this is kind of more urgent of an issue for me :-) Gennadiy, could you please tell us your opinion about this change? Can it be applied to Boost.Test?
Boris
Best Regards, Gevorg