7 Apr
2021
7 Apr
'21
6:37 p.m.
On 4/7/2021 2:15 PM, Anil Muthigi via Boost-users wrote:
I dont think so...
If it is available why do you think variant would not support it ?
I guess int128_t under boost/multiprecision/cpp_int is the only viable option.
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, 11:39 pm David Frank via Boost-users,
mailto:boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: especially the gnu __int128?