Re: [Boost-users] [test] Is standalone use possible?

...

Is there any other way to access a slimmed-down standalone version of Boost.Test?

It would be far easier to use CATCH and wrap it with Boost test macro equivalents.

Interesting. I don't think it will be practical for this codebase though, as I'd have to rewrite all the tests. I'm using Boost.Test's manual test registration (instead of the macros) because my tests all inherit from a base class which provides the tests, with the child classes loading different file format handlers and then running the base class tests against them. It doesn't look like Catch can handle this sort of thing without preprocessor hacks, so it'd probably end up being a huge rewrite. Cheers, Adam.