16 Dec
2004
16 Dec
'04
2:34 p.m.
On Dec 16, 2004, at 3:49 AM, gast128 wrote:
O thanks. I completely missed that section.
Now I have to tell the programmers here, that there is still use for auto_ptr. I had them make believe that boost's smart_ptr's are superior in every way, but I obviously forgot this case.
Fwiw, Jonathan's move_ptr is superior to auto_ptr, and can completely replace it. -Howard