4 Aug
2007
4 Aug
'07
1:39 a.m.
Would it be prudent to patch the Boost headers to only define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN if it is not already defined? If not, is there another solution that I am overlooking.
Ok, I dropped WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN from Spirit. I discussed it with Hartmut and neither of us know where that came from. Probably a pre-boost artifact. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net