Thanks for your replies Steven Watanabe-4 wrote:
AMDG
Eric Niebler wrote:
This is arguably a bug in gcc's vector implementation in that it doesn't work property with types that have overloaded unary operator&. It's possible that I might be able to work around the problem in xpressive. Feel free to file a bug against xpressive at svn.boost.org. You should also file a bug against gcc at gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla.
I think gcc is okay. See 20.1.3 table 30
expression - return type - requirement &t - T* - denotes the address of t.
In Christ, Steven Watanabe
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/xpressive-compilation-error-tp26609113p26632760.html Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.