5 Aug
2007
5 Aug
'07
10:09 a.m.
Great! Thank you for your quick resolution of this problem. I hope the
remaining defines in other library headers also can be removed.
// Anders
On 8/4/07, Joel de Guzman
Would it be prudent to patch the Boost headers to only define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN if it is not already defined? If not, is there another solution that I am overlooking.
Ok, I dropped WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN from Spirit. I discussed it with Hartmut and neither of us know where that came from. Probably a pre-boost artifact.
Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users