Re: [Boost-users] Building with CMake?

PLOT TWIST: Boost Build uses CMake internally. DUN DUN dunnnnn... (Sorry about that. I have no idea if that’s true. I know this probably will get me kicked out of this list, but you know, right time, right place :)

El 24 nov. 2019, a la(s) 10:32, Adder via Boost-users escribió:



...

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 15:46 David Demelier via Boost-users wrote:

Le 08/10/2019 à 18:52, Mateusz Loskot via Boost-users a écrit :

...

...

1. This essentially means library maintainers are choosing to maintain at least 2 build systems (bjam for overall boost build, + whatever preferential build system they use for the library itself).

It is not as difficult or time consuming as one may think.

No offense but who on earth except Boost really use bjam by choice?

For me, Boost Build is more scalable, better designed, encouraging a saner workflow and file organization, more ambitious, and easier to understand than other build systems I have used.

I personally think there is much to learn from working with it.

I hope one day we can make it work a little faster and allow users to override dependence-or-independence of specific targets on specific features/properties.

But still, I love Boost Build. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users