16 Dec
2006
16 Dec
'06
7:15 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Peter Dimov wrote:
Clark S. Cox III wrote:
A couple of questions:
Is there any rational behind the fact that boost::detail::atomic_count doesn't have a default constructor?
The interface is specified in a way that makes 'int' or 'long' meet its requirements, so that one can typedef atomic_count to int/long in ST builds.
OK, that makes perfect sense, thanks. - -- Clark S. Cox III clarkcox3@gmail.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFhEXYXkPInUR5a8wRAhzWAJ42WK68VclWFMkIGCcGuy+UF2nAlgCfTOUo 9ZTYvBOV4Qu8LWFTGt8VYK8= =1KDd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----