7 Sep
2010
7 Sep
'10
7:08 p.m.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Ilya Murav'jov
Klaim пишет:
msvc), and CLang is also meant to be radically faster than GCC. See http://clang.llvm.org/performance.html
There is nothing about C++, only about C and Objective-C. Anything more about Clang?
In my own personal experience, clang is about 500% faster then GCC on my Ubuntu system with identical highly templated Boost code, but then I have GCC 4.4 installed as well, GCC 4.5 is a *lot* faster in many cases then 4.4. GCC in general does still produce faster code then clang though, so it is a trade-off.