Re: Any interest in a weak pointer?

--- In Boost-Users@y..., "Peter Dimov" wrote:

From: "terekhov"

...

--- In Boost-Users@y..., "Peter Dimov" wrote: [...]

...

Indeed, see

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/smart_ptr_3.zip

Please revisit thread-safety/memory visibility issues wrt atomic ++/-- and MP-safe ref.counting of mutable objects...

Could you please elaborate on that? I've read the articles at

...

http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3BC8463D.6E23002A% 40web.de

and:

http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3C3C9B63.DFDC9920% 40web.de

but I don't see the problem.

Just read the following write-up: http://www.primenet.com/~jakubik/mpsafe/MultiprocessorSafe.pdf "Relaxed multiprocessor memory models...." regards, alexander.