Cool, that maybe helpful. I will try it and see if I can identify any thing interestring here.
Thanks
Athrun
At 2014-07-04 08:10:46, "Adam Romanek"
On 03.07.2014 23:10, 饭桶 wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know why -std=c++11 causes so much difference on boost::function?
I was planed to understand if there any performance issues with big size of parameters. So I wrote a function that takes a vector as parameter, like func2 shows. I know it's better to use a pointer or reference as function parameter. I just want to evaluate the performance, so let's keep the vector as parameter.
However, I found that it's quite slow when compiled with -std=c++11. In detail, it takes 173874 milliseconds with C++11, while it takes 3676 seconds without C++11.
About 50 times slower!! How can that be?
In my opinion, I thought boost::function should had the same performance with std::function. So I decided to try std::function in C++11 directly, Finally, it takes about 29233 milliseconds. That's till 8 times slows!
Can anyone tell me what happend here?
int func2(std::vector<int> i){ total += i.size(); return i.size(); }
const int T = 1000000; s = boost::chrono::system_clock::now(); for (int i = 0; i < T; ++i) call(boost::bind(&func2, v)); e = boost::chrono::system_clock::now();
In case you need to know my enviorment, my OS is Arch, compiler is gcc 4.9.0, and optimizations are default. The execution time (ms) of three versions I tried: boost::function with C++11 : 173874 boost::function without C++11 : 3676 std::function in C++11 : 29233
Any thoughts are appreciated!
Hi!
I'd run the example code through Callgrind (valgrind --tool=callgrind) and then compare the reports in KCachegrind. This should at least give you an idea of the source of the problem.
I may do that myself during the weekend in case you would not able to do that on your own.
WBR, Adam Romanek
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users