24 Feb
2006
24 Feb
'06
11:14 p.m.
"Paul Mensonides" wrote
*But*, it still comes down to a more fundamental issue.... Should the library endorse the use of the types of metaprogramming constructs themselves as non-metatypes? I'd say it shouldn't. If you need that for 'int_' (e.g.) then say 'int_
::value>'
That wont work if you need to use pass the function to another function. regards Andy Little