[Boost-users] Re: [variant] is_a/can_be

...

BTW, another two small remarks: The "variant::types" typedef that was used here is not documented, and it will be helpful if I could read about it and about its possible usages.

variant::types is documented here: http://boost.org/doc/html/boost/variant.html

Bruno

Well, first of all, you're right. My mistake, I missed it. However, when thinking about why I missed it, I realized that its because it's not a colored link, like all other classes/functions. Why should a typedef be underprivileged compared to classes/functions? It's part of the interface and should be documented in the same way (and not just as a side note). I hope I'm not too much of a nagger... :-)