[Boost-users] Re: Feature request for boost::filesystem

6 Jul 2004

      David Abrahams wrote:
...
Vladimir Prus  writes:
...
...
I am always in favor of
designs which are clear and understandable over all other
considerations.
And what's so un-understantable about boost::path which has both narrow
and wide methods?
I'm finding it hard to argue with that idea.
You mean it's hard to argue with the idea to have

   class path {
      path(char*)
      path(wchar_t*);
   }

or with the idea to have

   template<class charT>
   class basic_path {
        basic_path(charT*)
   };

or that designs should be clear and understandable? ;-)

- Volodya