16 Dec
2004
16 Dec
'04
3:22 p.m.
gast128 wrote:
O thanks. I completely missed that section.
Now I have to tell the programmers here, that there is still use for auto_ptr. I had them make believe that boost's smart_ptr's are superior in every way, but I obviously forgot this case.
The goal wasn't to replace auto_ptr, but to complement it. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com