
25 Dec
2014
25 Dec
'14
9:49 p.m.
Merrill Cornish wrote
Should I define the serialize<> function for the class, but with an empty body, since there are no data members to be saved?
That is not the only solution - but it's a simple and works well - stick with that for now Robert Ramey -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Serialize-How-to-serialize-a-class-with-N... Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.