29 Jan
2014
29 Jan
'14
8:08 p.m.
AMDG On 01/29/2014 11:02 AM, Rhys Ulerich wrote:
Is there a feature within accumulators to count NaNs on extraction but to otherwise ignore them? Maybe some sort of pass filter on incoming data? I've got a situation where I'd like to avoid NaNs clobbering otherwise useful information, but I still want to total count of data seen to include them.
The context is a time integrator for a physics simulation. The integrator tracks the number of timesteps. When the physics kicks back a NaN (because something's amiss), I'd like to count the failed timestep but not have the NaN destroy the useful mean of timesteps taken thus far.
This behavior of count would break any accumulator that depends on count (e.g. mean). In Christ, Steven Watanabe