15 Dec
2006
15 Dec
'06
9:26 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A couple of questions: Is there any rational behind the fact that boost::detail::atomic_count doesn't have a default constructor? For what reason is atomic_count an implementation detail, and not available for general use? (i.e. why is it in boost::detail, and not boost::) - -- Clark S. Cox III clarkcox3@gmail.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFgxMRXkPInUR5a8wRApfMAJoCiK/xH7K0u2GZnn3QoEk42bqznwCfQ9r0 s60aQuCL2IC1CB1Xi5uhBqQ= =roHz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----