Mauricio Gomes writes:
According to these reports it seems there is not a single compiler able to compile 100% of boost, is that right ?
Yes, it's a technically correct statement w.r.t. CVS-HEAD, but it's more a reflection of the current state of our codebase than that of the tested compilers' compliance.
http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/cvs-head/user/summary.... http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/cvs-head/developer/sum...
What is the best compiler to use boost ? Or in a less subjective way, what is the compiler that pass most tests ?
Although it is mentioned here (http://www.boost.org/status/compiler_status.html) otherwise the link to the "Compiler Status Summary" page is only showing reports on Linux and it is not mentioning the version (CVS-HEAD ?). The other reports (links above) show the results for several platforms but they seem to be only available for CVS-HEAD.
Where can I find the reports for a specific version like 1.32 for example ?
See http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/1_32_0/developer/summa... HTH, -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering