Re: [Boost-users] listS vecS

On Mar 18, 2005, at 10:35 AM, panoply@att.net wrote:

What is the underlying implementation of listS or vecS?  Are they just STL vectors and lists?  If the answer is yes, then there is a good deal of comfort I have about what I can or cannot get away with...

listS is an std::list, vecS is an std::vector

Is there any other type besides those two allowed, or planned for future versions of BGL?

There are several others: setS (std::set), multisetS (std::multiset), mapS (std::map, probably broken), slistS (the SGI extension slist), hash_setS (the SGI extension hash_set; not well-maintained). Doug