30 Oct
2019
30 Oct
'19
2:03 a.m.
On Oct 29, 2019, at 4:26 PM, Gavin Lambert via Boost-users
wrote:
Returning end of range on failure is incredibly inconvenient (for the consumer; granted it's usually more convenient for the algorithm implementer), and I'd be happier if STL algorithms didn't do that either.
“incredibly inconvenient”? Is it possible that you are over stating your case?