7 Sep
2010
7 Sep
'10
11:05 p.m.
On 9/7/2010 12:10 PM, Christophe Henry wrote:
the same effect can be achieved by simply calling: fsm.process_event(none());
And now we are UML-conform. We have our completion semantics for the first time the source state becomes active, and our standard event semantics using "none" as event. And this costs us no extra transition. Now this is a win-win scenario :) So, process_completion is out :)
I like both standards conforming and "win-win"! Looks good to me. Nice job. michael -- ---------------------------------- Michael Caisse Object Modeling Designs www.objectmodelingdesigns.com