28 Sep
2005
28 Sep
'05
6:44 a.m.
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
I realize that boost::process is not up and running yet, so this might be a usage conflict of posix & boost. Can somebody please enlighten me what the usage pattern here should be? I agree with Ian McCulloch's reply. What are you thinking would be a better aproach?
Having thought about this further, and actually tried SA_RESTART, it seems to work nicely, and there probably is no other useful alternative. My thanks to Ian and you. Marcus