4 Oct
2017
4 Oct
'17
6:02 p.m.
El 04/10/2017 a las 16:28, Ion Gaztañaga via Boost-users escribió:
On 04/10/2017 9:09, Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost-users wrote:
This compiles and works fine; of course, if a segment reallocation is tried (when adding the 101st element) a not_moveable exception is thrown.
But I understand users don't care about the internal reallocation, they just want to add more elements to the container, and they maybe can't modify the definition of the base class / interface.
Absolutely, this was just an example of the resulting behavior with a non-moveable class. I still am of the opinion that the available interface would be too restrictive to consider the case with the lib. Joaquín M López Muñoz