It seems that at least macro definition for the map of 150 tuples worked. Now I face a new problem. To reduce compilation times we decided to use map10, map20 etc. Unfortunately as we found out this will not compile if I pass to map10 only 7 arguments. With unnumbered map these elements were default initialized with "na" type. Why isn't this
;) That was easy. But if I use the preprocessor statement to generate map150, which is derived from map50, then I do not get map149. Is it correct? So then I need to write for each map I am going to use a separate preprocessor statement. Is it so, or do I oversee smth? Thanks in advance, Ovanes -----Original Message----- From: David Abrahams [mailto:dave@boost-consulting.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 8:33 PM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [mpl::map] Still problems with map "Ovanes Markarian" <om_boost@keywallet.com> writes: the case with numbered maps? Because they weren't designed that way. If you want to pass 7 arguments, use map7<...> -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users