Re: boost::mutex::scoped_lock conventions

"William E. Kempf" wrote: [...]

I'm going to try this one time.

Say what you mean to say, or don't say anything at all.

This time, I want to say that you should finally join and start your activity there with some explanation why the AND the upcoming <cthread> header should really define something like pthread_null(), pthread_compare() and pthread_hash(), extern "C++" pthread_once()-and-etc.-with-function-ptrs from <cthread> aside for a moment. I'd just say that this needs to done in order to provide some "symmetry" with respect to <thread>/boost.thread stuff, or something like that. regards, alexander. -- http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg23913.php