16 Feb
2014
16 Feb
'14
1:04 p.m.
On 15 February 2014 21:11, gast128
my experience with Visual Studio where the Dinkumware implementation almost always outperforms or is similar to a Boost implementation
I had one big bad experience with std::unordered_map in the past, see topic 'Performance difference between std::unordered_map and boost::unordered_map' (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c++.moderated/pFBjDiW6mW0).
According to Joaquin's recent benchmarks the recent standard implementations are generally faster than the boost implementation, which IMO is how it should be. I'm looking forward to Boost.Unordered's obsolescence. http://bannalia.blogspot.co.uk/