18 May
2009
18 May
'09
2:58 p.m.
Sebastian Redl wrote:
Nat Goodspeed wrote:
Instead of incrementally enhancing a minimal XML parser, wouldn't it make more sense to jump right to an existing full-blown parser implementation?
In the case of Serialization, that adds a Boost-external dependency. In the case of PropertyTree, this adds a compile-time dependency to a header-only library. Unless that parser is pugxml, but I don't really trust it.
Sorry for being unclear. I was suggesting that the OP use a full-blown XML parser for his own purposes -- comments and arbitrary order and such. I was not suggesting that anyone replace the Serialization library's minimal XML parser for all other users.