13 Dec
2014
13 Dec
'14
4:24 a.m.
Hi JB, JB wrote:
I just read the header files on the two different version of boost and I think I answered my own question. The equivalent functionality was essentially renamed element_type. I'd still appreciate confirmation that I got that right.
You're correct, value_type was removed. As a note, element_type was
always the correct typedef to access (value_type was undocumented). I was bit by that myself in a couple places. HTH, Nate