2 Aug
2007
2 Aug
'07
5:39 p.m.
"Pierre-Jules Tremblay"
wrote in message news:4590bfef0707230842t2e296753g9546b73e2de8cc25@mail.gmail.com... Just for my personal culture, given that your object will have a vtable anyway, what's wrong with a virtual dtor() ? Cheers,
Nothing really. It just doesn't have to be. If by any chance the design will change, I do not want destructor to be the only virtual function. Gennadiy