Re: [Boost-users] conflicting intmax_t definitions - Boost 1.53 and gcc 4.8 incompatibility?

On 22/01/2014 12:31, Quoth Nevin Liber:

On 21 January 2014 16:31, Gavin Lambert mailto:gavinl@compacsort.com> wrote:

Or worse, std::shared_ptr vs. boost::shared_ptr (as AFAIK there is no way to interop these without copying the underlying object, which breaks the semantics).

Well, you /can/, but it's a bit of a hack... http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12314967/cohabitation-of-boostshared-ptr-....

I was wondering if something along those sort of lines would work, after I posted that. But that's actually pretty clever. (Of course "clever" is not always a good thing in code.)