Op 9-1-2011 17:29, Steven Watanabe schreef:
AMDG
On 1/9/2011 6:03 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
Writing a variant replacement is actually quite easy, and doing so would greatly reduce your compile times. Variant is old, full of quirks, and doesn't scale well. Why it even requires its MPL input sequence to be Front Extensible (which it doesn't even state in its documentation) is beyond me. This is a very annoying limitation that makes it impractical to use with a large amount of types, since compatibility with joint_view would be very nice in that situation.
So, why not fix Boost.Variant instead of having everyone roll his own?
In Christ, Steven Watanabe
Fully agree on that Steven. Would help though to also mention its limitations + rationale in the documentation. It is mentioned to set /Zm on out of memory errors but the root-cause why you got the out-of-memory problem in the first place is not addressed. Paul