Re: Re: Thanks all - I got what I wanted!!

"Beman Dawes" wrote in message news:4.3.2.7.2.20021219221810.01ac1910@mailhost.esva.net...

At 05:29 PM 12/19/2002, David Abrahams wrote:

...

"Daniel Yerushalmi" writes:

...

...

I want to do something equivalant... (in my opinion it should by default to build all the four (eight including debug/release) option.... )

Talk to Beman about it; he's the filesystem guy. BTW I'm pretty sure there are only six combinations, since the DLL runtime is always MT-enabled.

I don't think the issue of exactly which libraries (all six, fewer?) to build is an isolated filesystem issue.

Rather, it is part of the larger install issue.

By that I mean that we now have a good way to do builds, and it will get even better with Boost.Build V2. But to some extent, that is a capability, not a complete solution. The complete solution would deliver a completely installed set of libraries, ready to go for your compiler.

At first glance, that seems easy. But remember that most of the expectation-raising examples we are all familiar with work for only one compiler and one operating system, and are custom-built for that compiler and O/S. So a general solution is a tough nut to crack.

--Beman

Info: http://www.boost.org Wiki: http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl Unsubscribe: mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/