My XML Archives on linux settels at 50 MB/s. The text archives nearly at the same range too. Oh, now I see, windows is much slower in XML Well, looks like it is streams issue, streams never were known for great performance (at least on windows). That's why you cant use boost::lexical_cast if you are performance oriented. See the shotscreen attached. It all goes down to put/peek/ignore etc. I guess this issue is eligible for Microsoft Connect issue to be opened :)
-----Original Message----- From: Boost-users [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Georg Gast Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 12:07 PM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] Runtime overhead of serialization archives Am 25.09.2016 um 10:56 schrieb Ernest Zaslavsky:
have you run my code from the post at 23.9.16 19:41 (make_array)? Yep
And here results for your latest code. Looks like it is doing quite well.
Dear Ernest, That result is in the same range as my current windows results. My main issue is, why is there such a big difference to the linux one? My XML Archives on linux settels at 50 MB/s. The text archives nearly at the same range too. See the added graphs. This is what i cant explain .... Georg
