Hi Guys,
I have three interesting questions in regard to graph properties.
Please assume Boost 1_29_0. I'm a little slow in upgrading ... ;-)
1. If I define:
MyGraph_t const myGraph;
Why cannot I get a property map to access my property:
typedef boost::property_map::type MyPropMap_t;
MyPropMap_t myPropMap = get(MyPropTag_t(), myGraph);
Instead I need to use for each access:
get(MyPropTag_t(), myGraph, *i)
I have noticed that gcc 3.2 complains in regard to conversion to a
non-scalar type being similar to that of myGraph without const-ness of
the nested property type. What can I do to get normal map access?
2. Why not use a copy constructor if it exists when copying graph
elements? Is the existence of a copy constructor a hard-yard to verfiy
with MPL?
3. I noticed that remove_edge(...) complains in regard to a missing
default constructor of a property object. Don't get me wrong; this
happened during an editing mishap and I know that we need regular
types here. Why is this required if you are removing an element?
Thanks for the pointers/opinions! :-)
Matt
