On Wednesday 03 July 2002 12:30 am, Jon Wang wrote:

Hi,

Recently I've tried to implement Andrei's ScopeGuard (see http://www.cuj.com/experts/1812/alexandr.htm?topic=experts for details) with boost.function and boost.bind. Is there anything wrong with it? Thanks for reviewing.

Looks fine to me. To rein in the compile times a little bit, you can pull in just the 0-argument version of function, e.g., #include // (not ) and use boost::function0<void> instead of boost::function<void>. Under MSVC, you might even get fewer senseless ICEs :) Doug